A .dta file is the native data format used by Stata, whereas a .csv file is a plain-text, tool-agnostic format. They serve similar purposes (tabular data storage) but differ significantly in structure and capabilities.
1. Core differences
| Aspect | .dta (Stata) | .csv |
|---|---|---|
| Format | Binary | Plain text |
| Primary use | Stata statistical analysis | General data exchange |
| Metadata | Rich (labels, types, formats) | None (data only) |
| Data types | Preserved explicitly | Inferred on load |
| Missing values | Multiple typed missing values (–) | Single convention (e.g. empty, NA) |
| File size | Typically smaller | Larger |
| Human-readable | No | Yes |
2. Metadata and semantics
.dta
A .dta file stores:
- Variable names and variable labels
- Value labels (e.g.
1 = "Yes",0 = "No") - Explicit data types (int, float, string, date)
- Display formats (dates, numeric precision)
- Multiple missing value categories ()
This makes .dta self-describing, which is important in statistical workflows.
.csv
A .csv file stores:
- Raw values only
- No schema, labels, or typing information
All structure is reconstructed at load time via inference or user-specified rules.
3. Interoperability
-
.csvis universally supported (Excel, Python, R, SQL, BI tools). -
.dtais primarily for Stata, but can be read by:pandas.read_stata()- R (
haven::read_dta())
However, some Stata-specific features (e.g. value labels) may be partially flattened depending on the tool.
4. Practical implications
When .dta is preferable
- You rely on labels and metadata for interpretation
- You want reproducibility in statistical analysis
- You work mainly in Stata or with Stata users
When .csv is preferable
- You need maximum portability
- Data is part of a pipeline (ETL, databases, APIs)
- You expect many tools or users to consume the data
5. Example (Python)
import pandas as pd
# Load Stata file (metadata-aware)
df_dta = pd.read_stata("survey_data.dta")
# Load CSV (types inferred)
df_csv = pd.read_csv("survey_data.csv")With .dta, pandas can retain labels and Stata missing values; with .csv, everything must be inferred or reconstructed manually.
6. Summary
.dta= analysis-oriented, metadata-rich, Stata-native.csv= simple, portable, schema-less
A common pattern is:
- Authoritative data stored as
.dta - Exchange and integration done via
.csv
If you want, I can also compare .dta with .parquet or discuss best practices for converting .dta into analytics pipelines.